Your professional reputation may be one of your most valuable assets. Physicians spend years building patient trust. Executives and hedge fund professionals rely on credibility to maintain investor confidence. Technology leaders often depend on their reputations to secure partnerships, funding, and career opportunities.
A single false statement can destroy a reputation, and you may have to fight hard to win it back. Fortunately, Colorado law recognizes that some false statements are so inherently harmful that they are defamatory on their face and may support a claim without proof of specific monetary loss. This doctrine is known as defamation per se.
If you are wondering what defamation per se is, when it applies, and whether you may have a legal claim, understanding the basics with attorney guidance can help you protect your reputation before the damage spreads.
Colorado defamation attorney Nicole A. Westbrook has more than 20 years of experience and provides strategic guidance and advocacy to Colorado professionals facing high-stakes reputational threats.
Learn how she can assist you by calling (303) 785-1666 or reaching out online today.
Defamation occurs when someone publishes a false statement that harms another person’s reputation. To “publish” a statement simply means to communicate it orally or in writing to a person other than the defamed party. A spoken defamatory statement is generally considered slander, while a written defamatory statement is generally considered libel.
Defamation per se refers to a limited group of false statements that are considered defamatory on their face. Unlike defamation per quod, these statements are recognized as inherently damaging because of the nature of the accusation itself.
The defamation per se elements include the applicable elements of standard defamation.
However, to qualify as defamation per se, a statement must falsely accuse the plaintiff of one of the following:
The defamatory meaning must be apparent from the statement itself rather than depend on outside facts or additional explanation. The statement must concern the plaintiff and unequivocally expose the person to public hatred or contempt.
The law recognizes that certain accusations naturally damage a person’s reputation. For professionals, trust is often the foundation of success. A false accusation can cause clients, employers, patients, or colleagues to question someone’s integrity and capabilities almost immediately. This is a major reason the defamation per se elements differ from those for defamation per quod.
Because of the obvious and immediate harm that defamation per se can cause, the law does not require the plaintiff to prove:
By comparison, a defamation per quod claim depends on additional context to reveal the statement’s defamatory meaning and generally requires proof of special damages.
Although every case depends on its specific facts, the following examples illustrate how defamation per se might look in the real world.
Imagine a professional in the financial sector whose coworker falsely tells colleagues that the professional embezzled client funds and altered accounting records to conceal the theft. The coworker shares these stories to entertain others on lunch breaks and during company happy hours.
The statements directly accuse the financial professional of criminal conduct and dishonesty connected to their occupation. If false, they may qualify as defamation per se because they allege a crime and attack the professional’s fitness to handle client funds.
Suppose someone spreads a false claim that a physician has been subject to multiple disciplinary actions by an out-of-state licensing board. Even if no such discipline ever occurred, the accusation directly attacks the physician’s professional qualifications and fitness to practice. Depending on the circumstances, such a statement may constitute defamation per se because it harms the physician in their profession.
Consider a rumor that falsely claims a chief financial officer manipulated corporate financial statements for personal gain. Even before any investigation occurs, such an accusation may severely damage the executive’s professional reputation. It calls into question the executive’s honesty and competence and may imply criminal or professionally disqualifying conduct.
The above are just a handful of examples of defamation per se. You should speak to an experienced defamation lawyer about your options and rights when others spread false accusations that threaten your reputation or career.
Even strong defamation claims have filing deadlines.
Colorado generally provides a one-year statute of limitations for actions involving libel and slander. Missing that deadline may prevent a claim from moving forward, making it important to evaluate potential claims promptly.
Individuals and professionals often underestimate how quickly false statements can spread. Social media, online review platforms, industry message boards, and private communications can amplify inaccurate information within hours.
Early legal guidance may help identify:
Early intervention may also help determine whether litigation, a demand for corrective action, an injunction, or another reputational rehabilitation strategy is appropriate. For many, protecting a carefully built reputation is often just as important as protecting any financial asset.
Nicole A. Westbrook is a Colorado defamation attorney who represents professionals and business leaders in sophisticated reputational disputes. Nicole is an award-winning trial attorney who focuses on your unique needs and can resolve disputes through negotiation or litigation.
Contact Nicole at (303) 785-1666 or by sending an online message to discuss your options when a false accusation threatens your career, professional standing, or livelihood.
No. The applicable legal standards vary depending on factors such as whether the plaintiff is a private person, a public official, or a public figure, and whether the statement involves a matter of public concern.
In general, a defamation per se plaintiff does not have to prove special damages, which are specific monetary losses caused by the statement. However, this does not mean the plaintiff automatically receives damages or is excused from proving all other applicable elements of the claim.
Libel generally refers to defamatory statements made in written or other permanent form, while slander generally refers to spoken statements.
Legal References Used to Inform This Page
To ensure the accuracy and clarity of this page, we referenced official legal and other resources during the content development process: