Many doctors believe that a baseless allegation from a patient is easy to challenge in court. In Colorado, this is often not the case. State law provides patients with significant protection to discuss their care, even in strong terms, and a doctor who sues over the wrong type of statement may risk more than just their reputation. However, when a patient’s words shift from opinion to fabricated facts, can a doctor sue a patient for defamation in Colorado? Yes, under the right circumstances.
For over 20 years, I have represented doctors and other medical professionals in these situations. As an experienced defamation lawyer in Colorado, I pursue litigation through trial when supported by the facts and law, and I work with a network of reputation management and media relations professionals to manage public perception during the case. This approach can make a difference both in court and in the public eye.
If a patient’s false statements threaten your license, credentials, or livelihood, contact me, Attorney Nicole Westbrook at (303) 785-1666 or through email for a confidential case evaluation.
Defamation of character occurs when someone makes a false statement of fact about another person, communicates it to a third party, and that statement damages the person’s reputation. Colorado law breaks a defamation claim into four elements, and suing a patient for defamation of character in a doctor-patient dispute means each of those elements plays out differently than in an average consumer complaint.
A statement like “Dr. Smith rushed my appointment” is a subjective gripe, and courts will not treat it as defamation. However, a statement like “Dr. Smith operated on the wrong knee” is a specific, checkable fact, and if it’s false, it can support a claim. The line between the two isn’t always obvious, and doctors who pursue a review that is really just an opinion dressed up as a fact often end up wasting time and money on a claim that never had legal merit.
The patient must communicate the false statement to someone other than the doctor. This can often appear as a Google or Yelp review, a post in a community Facebook group, a complaint letter to a hospital board, or comments to other patients. Written reviews are generally easier to prove than spoken rumors.
A private individual typically must show that the patient was negligent. However, if the statement involves a matter of public concern, such as patient care or safety, courts may require proof of actual malice, meaning the patient knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. The applicable standard often determines whether a suit can proceed.
Finally, the claim requires proof of damage. Typically, the plaintiff must demonstrate actual harm linked to the false statement, such as lost patients, lost referrals, damaged professional standing, or measurable financial loss. Courts require a clear connection between the statement and a tangible consequence, not just emotional distress.
Some statements are so inherently damaging that Colorado law presumes harm without separate proof of monetary loss.
These “defamation per se” categories include:
Any of these allegations can be particularly damaging to a doctor, as they directly affect a doctor’s reputation and referral relationships, which are essential to a medical practice. Harm may result from a public review or a knowingly false complaint filed with a hospital credentialing committee.
In Colorado, a doctor has one year from the date of the statement to file a defamation claim. The claim becomes permanently barred if the deadline is missed, regardless of the statement’s impact, the strength of the evidence, or even if the statement remains on record and causes ongoing harm.
Any doctor considering a lawsuit against a patient must account for a significant procedural risk: Colorado’s anti-SLAPP statute. This law allows a patient to file a special motion to dismiss if their statement relates to a public issue. If granted, the doctor must pay the patient’s attorney’s fees. If denied, the patient may be required to pay the doctor’s fees, which discourages frivolous motions.
In one Colorado case, a dental practice sued a patient over one-star Yelp and Google reviews describing ongoing pain after a procedure. The court ruled in favor of the patient because her statements were supported by second and third opinions from other dentists, finding no actual malice. The practice was ordered to pay her fees, highlighting the risk of suing over reviews that are opinions supported by facts.
In another Colorado case, a client posted 36 statements accusing a business of malpractice and incompetence. The court found that most statements were not intended to inform the public but to incite retaliation, and denied the anti-SLAPP motion, allowing the lawsuit to proceed.
Can a doctor sue a patient for defamation in Colorado? Yes, but only when the patient’s statement shifts from opinion to a false, fabricated fact that causes actual harm. A one-star review about a long wait or rushed visit is a protected opinion, and not necessarily worth the cost to pursue. Cases worth pursuing involve fabricated accusations that threaten hospital privileges, board certification, access to financing, or standing in a competitive specialty, where reputation is a critical asset.
I represent doctors and other medical professionals whose reputations and livelihoods are at risk. I pair litigation with a network of reputation management and media relations professionals who work to correct the public record while a case is pending. A false accusation rarely stays contained to a single post or complaint. Left unanswered, it can follow a doctor into future credentialing reviews, referral conversations, and patient searches, until it gets treated as fact simply because no one challenged it.
If a patient’s false statement threatens your license, credentials, or career, contact Nicole Westbrook online or by calling (303) 785-1666 today.
Only if the review contains a false statement of fact, not an opinion, and the patient can’t tie that statement to a legitimate basis like a second medical opinion.
Generally, no. Most doctors are private individuals, though statements about patient care can still touch on issues of public concern, which affects how courts analyze fault and the anti-SLAPP statute.
One year from the date of the statement.
Generally, no. A public response can create new statements that complicate the case and, in some situations, even expose the doctor to a counterclaim. Document the statement and consult an attorney first, since how the situation is handled early can affect the legal options available later.
Possibly. Complaints made in good faith are generally protected, but a knowingly false complaint that leads to a suspension, denial of credentialing, or other real harm can support a defamation claim.
Legal References Used to Inform This Page
To ensure the accuracy and clarity of this page, we referenced official legal and other resources during the content development process: