Definition of 'Note' in Colorado Securities Act Limited
The Colorado Court of Appeals reversed a criminal conviction for securities fraud pursuant to C.R.S. § 11-51-501(1)(b) finding the trial court erred in refusing to give a proffered instruction that not all promissory notes are securities for purposes of the Colorado Securities Act (CSA). In People v. Mendenhall, 363 P.3d 758 (2015), the court examined an instruction defining ‘security’ for purposes of the CSA which stated simply that the term “security means any note.” Relying upon Reves v. Ernst & Young, 110 S.Ct. 945 (1990), the Colorado Court of Appeals concluded that the term “any note,” included in the definition of security under both the CSA and federal Securities Exchange Act of 1934, should not be interpreted to mean literally ‘any note’ because not all notes are securities. Mendenhall, 363 P.3d at 768, Reves 110 S.Ct. 945. Instead, the term ‘note’ under the CSA must be interpreted under the so-called “family resemblance” test articulated in Reves and the four factors articulated therein. Although Mendenhall was a criminal prosecution, it nevertheless amounts to an interpretation of the CSA. It remains to be seen what impact Mendenhall will have on the Colorado Securities Commissioner's decisions in bringing civil enforcement or cease and desist proceedings involving promissory notes. A copy of Mendenhall can be found here.
This communication is provided for your information only and is not intended to constitute legal advice or legal opinion as to any particular situation. You should not take, or refrain from taking, any action based on information in this article, without seeking legal counsel from an attorney on your particular facts and circumstances. Jones & Keller would be happy to provide you with specific advice about particular situations, if desired. Do not hesitate to contact us.